Quote from giapvo on 15. August 2019, 6:48Hi Richard,
My name is Giap and I'm currently testing Prism on Maya. I have a feature I would like to suggest.
Currently, there are 2 episodes in the project that I'm working on. Prism at this stage only let me create sequence and shot but we can't separate them into different episode. So I'm currently put sequence 1 shot 1 for the first episode but for the second episode, I need to put it in sequence 12 shot 1. This could work if we work on simple project but for series, I found it's quite hard to work it.
I'm thinking of working around by separate the episode into different project but then I have to reload the Assets to that project and so on. I wonder how you're going to working on such project with Prism.
Thanks for the awesome work on Prism.
Giap.
Hi Richard,
My name is Giap and I'm currently testing Prism on Maya. I have a feature I would like to suggest.
Currently, there are 2 episodes in the project that I'm working on. Prism at this stage only let me create sequence and shot but we can't separate them into different episode. So I'm currently put sequence 1 shot 1 for the first episode but for the second episode, I need to put it in sequence 12 shot 1. This could work if we work on simple project but for series, I found it's quite hard to work it.
I'm thinking of working around by separate the episode into different project but then I have to reload the Assets to that project and so on. I wonder how you're going to working on such project with Prism.
Thanks for the awesome work on Prism.
Giap.
Quote from RichardF on 15. August 2019, 16:04Hey Giap,
For episodic work a new option for an episode name would be the best way definitely. It's already on the to do list, but until it's implemented the best way would probably be to use sequence names like these:
- ep01seq01
- ep01seq02
- ep02seq01
Thanks for your feedback.
Hey Giap,
For episodic work a new option for an episode name would be the best way definitely. It's already on the to do list, but until it's implemented the best way would probably be to use sequence names like these:
Thanks for your feedback.
Quote from AndreBergs on 4. January 2024, 17:22+1
Is there any progress on this?
+1
Is there any progress on this?
